Something Completely Different
(photo 1 header
collage of London Andrews)
I
get asked online about London Andrews her career and events within
it, all the time. I get asked about what she is doing in her life now
regularly. I leave the girl who was London Andrews alone. I’m kept
up to date by various people updating periodically. Because of
repeated questions and events, in May I did a little post wishing her
well :
“17
May 2026
BEST
WISHES
I
try not on intrude on the girl who was London. But I feel I must wish
her, All The Best, for a full recovery from major surgery and in a
court case that shouldn’t be happening. And thus as a way to update
you.”
When
replying to online questions and comments I made the following
observation :
“She
needed surgery for a growth in her abdomen. All seems to be going
well, I'm informed. The court case? Sadly, it seems that a chancer is
taking her to court over a lost cat, of all things. Looking like
someone is trying to get money out of the sanctuary.”
(photo
2 screenshot collage)
It
turns out I was wrong and I need to make a correction...a very big
correction.
At
the end of June new material, links, screenshots etc, were sent to me
about the court case I
mentioned that involved London Andrews. Or should I say the girl who
used be London Andrews and wow,
was it interesting.
First,
before going into the details of why this is so interesting and
relevant to me and story
told by this blog, lets
deal with the correction. I had dismissed the plaintiff of this court
case as a ‘chancer’. Someone trying it on over a lost cat. This
was incorrect and I was wrong to state that.
Always
remember there are two sides to a story…..
It
appears that the case wasn’t really about the lost the lost cat. It
was driven by the
response, behaviour and statements from the animal sanctuary that the
girl who was London now runs. And importantly as part of its legal
settlement of the court case, the sanctuary has had to publicly
correct what they has said about the plaintiff with this statement :
“OFS
Statement
A
Note from OFS Regarding the ****** Matter
OFS
and Ms. ****** have amicably resolved the lawsuit concerning Tomcat,
Ms. ****** cat who was lost during an OFS transport following a
spay/neuter clinic visit. We are grateful for the opportunity to put
this matter behind us — and to correct the record.
A
number of things were said about Tomcat and Ms. ****** that were
simply not true, and we want to own that here.
Tomcat
was not a "stray" when he was lost. He was not a cat who
lived outdoors, without a litterbox, or one who took weeks to warm up
to his family. He was not feral, and he did not come from OFS. Tomcat
was a cherished member of the ****** household, deeply loved, and
very much missed. We regret any implications to the contrary.
We
also implied that Ms. ****** had declined to microchip Tomcat out of
unwillingness to pay for it. That was wrong, and we're sorry for it.
Ms. ****** shared with OFS that she had been researching the
procedure and was concerned about published literature indicating a
risk of fibrosarcoma at microchip implantation sites. She was making
a thoughtful decision for her pet — not a careless one.
We
said that Ms. ****** lawsuit would put OFS out of business and
eliminate 1,000 spay/neuter procedures. While OFS was genuinely
frightened about its financial survival — our insurance did not
cover the suit, and we could not afford legal representation — that
outcome has thankfully not come to pass. The claim about 1,000
procedures was also not accurate. With respect to the specific
program at issue, owners typically pay for their own animals'
procedures, and OFS does not perform spays or neuters itself. The
suggestion that each procedure cost $10 was false as well.
Finally,
we said that Ms. ****** was "hostile" and that she
"harassed" OFS and its volunteers. She did neither, and we
retract those characterizations entirely.
We
care deeply about the animals and people in our community, and we
recognize that we fell short of that commitment in how we spoke about
Ms. ****** and Tomcat. We're glad this has been resolved, and we wish
the ****** family well.
—
OFS”
That
was the full statement. So,
what had they done other than lose a cat ? Now
lets break it down ?
(photo
3 pinned post)
“….grateful for
the opportunity to put this matter behind us — and to correct the
record.
A number of things
were said…...were simply not true, and we want to own that here.
Tomcat was not….We
regret any implications to the contrary.
We also implied
that….That was wrong, and we're sorry for it.
We said that…..(the)
lawsuit would put OFS out of business ….. was also not accurate.
With respect to the specific program at issue….was false as well.
Finally, we said
that…(plaintiff)….was "hostile" and that she "harassed"
OFS and its volunteers. She did neither, and we retract those
characterizations entirely.
…..and we
recognize that we fell short of that commitment in how we spoke about
….”
(photo 4 full
statement)
Does this sound
familiar ? Have you noticed this type of thing before ?
Haven’t we seen
this kind of response elsewhere ?
OFS/LA had to,
“correct the record” ! Think about that one ?
(Note, for the rest
of article I will use ‘OFS/LA’ as short hand for the person
responsible and plaintiff for the woman who took OFS/LA to court.)
OFS/LA, stated
things that, “were simply untrue” !
OFS/LA, had
repeatedly implied things about the plaintiff that were, “wrong”.
They had said things
that were, “not accurate”.
She had
misrepresented the plaintiff and or events and this was, “false as
well.”
And OFS/LA had had
to “retract” their apparent character assassination of the
plaintiff.
So, OFS/LA’s
settlement statement is an admission of a nasty, massively over the
top response to someone rasing an issue, questioning something.
Why does that ring
bells ?
Because OFS/LA the
person who did all these things that they had to be forced to legally
“correct the record” and retract all the untrue, false, wrong,
misrepresentation etc etc. Is the girl who was London Andrews. The
who did exactly the same to me in 2023 !
And this isn’t the
half of it.
(photo 5 IG post)
When I started to
follow the links I’d been sent and follow the story across the web
and social media, I discovered that there was way more to this story
than just this. First, it wasn’t just what OFS/LA had said about
the plaintiff in those misrepresentative, false….you know those
lying posts and comments. It was also the fact there had been a lot
of trolling going on. The trolling was wonderfully summed by someone
with the expression, ‘She released her flying monkey's.’
OFS/LA’s false
narrative about events and the plaintiff, by accident or design, put
many of her fans and followers into troll mode ! The plaintiff and
anyone who even questioned what OFS/LA said, were subject to abuse,
accusations and denials for months. (notice a similarity ?)
At the start of this
month, when reviewing items of public record online, newspaper
reports covering OFS/LA’s court case, the retraction and correction
of of all the false claims and accusations. Her ‘flying monkey's’
were still at it. Denial, deflection, misrepresentation, attempts to
counter the facts of the statement with ‘whataboutary’. Making
counter claims to try and diminish the scale of what OFS/LA had had
to admit too.
(Photo 6 Chronicle
screenshot)
And you want to hear
the screams from the ‘flying monkey's’, if anyone dare to ask
questions about the $20,000 dollars defence fund ‘Go Fund Me’
raised ! Realise that support for that fund was based on the online
lies that OFS/LA told, that generated the court case in the first
place.
It gets worse. As I
followed the links through social media, I found that this familiar
pattern of behaviour by OFS/LA had been inflected on at least more
two individuals and an animal rescue. This response, behaviour,
tactic, call it what you will, was verified by numerous others on
social media posts, in the wake of the court case. One of those
remarked that it was, ‘the same M.O. that had used against her.’
Just as an aside,
the plaintiff’s posts and comments were hard to find directly, her
profile and the groups and pages she shared her thoughts on these
events were private ones. I was also surprised how few times
OFA/LA’s past career and the main method of financing the sanctuary
were mentioned. Given the rural nature of the area she lives and its
conservative mentality, it was good that this was not used against
her as much as I had thought it would be.
(photo 7. Everyone
asks what did you do ? No one thinks to ask, what she do ?)
In Conclusion
OFS/LA said they
were being sued and possibly shut down by a court case over a lost
cat. Yes and no, misrepresentation, definitely. It was also about
what OFS/LA had said and done to the plaintiff following the loss of
the cat. What had been said and done was an excessive, over the top
response of claims, accusations, misrepresentation and lies ! And it
strikes me as pointed that OFS/LA in one of her posts about this
puts, “settled" and “resolved”, in inverted commas !
And this type of
response and treatment, tactic (?) had been used on at least three
others, well five…
This response can be
summed up as :
“To
become abusive. To attack. To exaggerate. To make false claims. To
misrepresent. To gaslight. To accuse. To bear false witness. To
misinform. To blame. To LIE ! To turn her one and half million
followers and even more fans onto…..”
Yes,
exactly the same response and treatment I detailed in my last post !
So, the plaintiff and the three new recipients I found mentioned
online, makes four. And myself, what happened to me in 2023, that
makes five. There may be others, but I don’t know of those...yet ?
And the really sad thing is,
OFS/LA has done so much good in her community, with animal rescue and
help with animal welfare. Her response here, her behaviour to this
event, has undermined a lot of the good she has done. And this
response, parallels London Andrews response and behaviour back in
2023 when I asked a simple question.
It didn’t work back then when
she ‘released her flying monkey's’ and did all of the above to
try and crush me and drive me from the internet. Instead it was
counter productive. She ended up with this blog detailing it all.
That response created a shadow, a
shadow that she will
someday have to explain.
Andy A
#londonandrews
#londonandrewsmodel
#beautiful
#sexy
#curvymodel
#adultmodel
#misrepresentation
#insults
#abuse
#lies
#blackmail
#catfishing
#londonandrewsproject
#londonandrewsandme
