Something Completely Different
(photo 1 header collage of London Andrews)
I get asked online about London Andrews her career and events within it, all the time. I get asked about what she is doing in her life now regularly. I leave the girl who was London Andrews alone. I’m kept up to date by various people updating periodically. Because of repeated questions and events, in May I did a little post wishing her well :
“17 May 2026
BEST WISHES
I try not on intrude on the girl who was London. But I feel I must wish her, All The Best, for a full recovery from major surgery and in a court case that shouldn’t be happening. And thus as a way to update you.”
When replying to online questions and comments I made the following observation :
“She needed surgery for a growth in her abdomen. All seems to be going well, I'm informed. The court case? Sadly, it seems that a chancer is taking her to court over a lost cat, of all things. Looking like someone is trying to get money out of the sanctuary.”
(photo 2 screenshot collage)
It turns out I was wrong and I need to make a correction...a very big correction.
At the end of June new material, links, screenshots etc, were sent to me about the court case I mentioned that involved London Andrews. Or should I say the girl who used be London Andrews and wow, was it interesting.
First, before going into the details of why this is so interesting and relevant to me and story told by this blog, lets deal with the correction. I had dismissed the plaintiff of this court case as a ‘chancer’. Someone trying it on over a lost cat. This was incorrect and I was wrong to state that.
Always remember there are two sides to a story…..
It appears that the case wasn’t really about the lost the lost cat. It was driven by the response, behaviour and statements from the animal sanctuary that the girl who was London now runs. And importantly as part of its legal settlement of the court case, the sanctuary has had to publicly correct what they has said about the plaintiff with this statement :
“OFS Statement
A Note from OFS Regarding the ****** Matter
OFS and Ms. ****** have amicably resolved the lawsuit concerning Tomcat, Ms. ****** cat who was lost during an OFS transport following a spay/neuter clinic visit. We are grateful for the opportunity to put this matter behind us — and to correct the record.
A number of things were said about Tomcat and Ms. ****** that were simply not true, and we want to own that here.
Tomcat was not a "stray" when he was lost. He was not a cat who lived outdoors, without a litterbox, or one who took weeks to warm up to his family. He was not feral, and he did not come from OFS. Tomcat was a cherished member of the ****** household, deeply loved, and very much missed. We regret any implications to the contrary.
We also implied that Ms. ****** had declined to microchip Tomcat out of unwillingness to pay for it. That was wrong, and we're sorry for it. Ms. ****** shared with OFS that she had been researching the procedure and was concerned about published literature indicating a risk of fibrosarcoma at microchip implantation sites. She was making a thoughtful decision for her pet — not a careless one.
We said that Ms. ****** lawsuit would put OFS out of business and eliminate 1,000 spay/neuter procedures. While OFS was genuinely frightened about its financial survival — our insurance did not cover the suit, and we could not afford legal representation — that outcome has thankfully not come to pass. The claim about 1,000 procedures was also not accurate. With respect to the specific program at issue, owners typically pay for their own animals' procedures, and OFS does not perform spays or neuters itself. The suggestion that each procedure cost $10 was false as well.
Finally, we said that Ms. ****** was "hostile" and that she "harassed" OFS and its volunteers. She did neither, and we retract those characterizations entirely.
We care deeply about the animals and people in our community, and we recognize that we fell short of that commitment in how we spoke about Ms. ****** and Tomcat. We're glad this has been resolved, and we wish the ****** family well.
— OFS”
That was the full statement. So, what had they done other than lose a cat ? Now lets break it down ?
(photo 3 pinned post)
“….grateful for the opportunity to put this matter behind us — and to correct the record.
A number of things were said…...were simply not true, and we want to own that here.
Tomcat was not….We regret any implications to the contrary.
We also implied that….That was wrong, and we're sorry for it.
We said that…..(the) lawsuit would put OFS out of business ….. was also not accurate. With respect to the specific program at issue….was false as well.
Finally, we said that…(plaintiff)….was "hostile" and that she "harassed" OFS and its volunteers. She did neither, and we retract those characterizations entirely.
…..and we recognize that we fell short of that commitment in how we spoke about ….”
(photo 4 full statement)
Does this sound familiar ? Have you noticed this type of thing before ?
Haven’t we seen this kind of response elsewhere ?
OFS/LA had to, “correct the record” ! Think about that one ?
(Note, for the rest of article I will use ‘OFS/LA’ as short hand for the person responsible and plaintiff for the woman who took OFS/LA to court.)
OFS/LA, stated things that, “were simply untrue” !
OFS/LA, had repeatedly implied things about the plaintiff that were, “wrong”.
They had said things that were, “not accurate”.
She had misrepresented the plaintiff and or events and this was, “false as well.”
And OFS/LA had had to “retract” their apparent character assassination of the plaintiff.
So, OFS/LA’s settlement statement is an admission of a nasty, massively over the top response to someone rasing an issue, questioning something.
Why does that ring bells ?
Because OFS/LA the person who did all these things that they had to be forced to legally “correct the record” and retract all the untrue, false, wrong, misrepresentation etc etc. Is the girl who was London Andrews. The who did exactly the same to me in 2023 !
And this isn’t the half of it.
(photo 5 IG post)
When I started to follow the links I’d been sent and follow the story across the web and social media, I discovered that there was way more to this story than just this. First, it wasn’t just what OFS/LA had said about the plaintiff in those misrepresentative, false….you know those lying posts and comments. It was also the fact there had been a lot of trolling going on. The trolling was wonderfully summed by someone with the expression, ‘She released her flying monkey's.’
OFS/LA’s false narrative about events and the plaintiff, by accident or design, put many of her fans and followers into troll mode ! The plaintiff and anyone who even questioned what OFS/LA said, were subject to abuse, accusations and denials for months. (notice a similarity ?)
At the start of this month, when reviewing items of public record online, newspaper reports covering OFS/LA’s court case, the retraction and correction of of all the false claims and accusations. Her ‘flying monkey's’ were still at it. Denial, deflection, misrepresentation, attempts to counter the facts of the statement with ‘whataboutary’. Making counter claims to try and diminish the scale of what OFS/LA had had to admit too.
(Photo 6 Chronicle screenshot)
And you want to hear the screams from the ‘flying monkey's’, if anyone dare to ask questions about the $20,000 dollars defence fund ‘Go Fund Me’ raised ! Realise that support for that fund was based on the online lies that OFS/LA told, that generated the court case in the first place.
It gets worse. As I followed the links through social media, I found that this familiar pattern of behaviour by OFS/LA had been inflected on at least more two individuals and an animal rescue. This response, behaviour, tactic, call it what you will, was verified by numerous others on social media posts, in the wake of the court case. One of those remarked that it was, ‘the same M.O. that had used against her.’
Just as an aside, the plaintiff’s posts and comments were hard to find directly, her profile and the groups and pages she shared her thoughts on these events were private ones. I was also surprised how few times OFA/LA’s past career and the main method of financing the sanctuary were mentioned. Given the rural nature of the area she lives and its conservative mentality, it was good that this was not used against her as much as I had thought it would be.
(photo 7. Everyone asks what did you do ? No one thinks to ask, what she do ?)
In Conclusion
OFS/LA said they were being sued and possibly shut down by a court case over a lost cat. Yes and no, misrepresentation, definitely. It was also about what OFS/LA had said and done to the plaintiff following the loss of the cat. What had been said and done was an excessive, over the top response of claims, accusations, misrepresentation and lies ! And it strikes me as pointed that OFS/LA in one of her posts about this puts, “settled and “resolved”, in inverted commas !
And this type of response and treatment, tactic (?) had been used on at least three others, well five…
This response can be summed up as :
“To become abusive. To attack. To exaggerate. To make false claims. To misrepresent. To gaslight. To accuse. To bear false witness. To misinform. To blame. To LIE ! To turn her one and half million followers and even more fans onto…..”
Yes, exactly the same response and treatment I detailed in my last post ! So, the plaintiff and the three new recipients I found mentioned online, makes four. And myself, what happened to me in 2023, that makes five. There may be others, but I don’t know of those...yet ?
And the really sad thing is, OFS/LA has done so much good in her community, with animal rescue and help with animal welfare. Her response here, her behaviour to this event, has undermined a lot of the good she has done. And this response, parallels London Andrews response and behaviour back in 2023 when I asked a simple question.
It didn’t work back then when she ‘released her flying monkey's’ and did all of the above to try and crush me and drive me from the internet. Instead it was counter productive. She ended up with this blog detailing it all. That response created a shadow, a shadow that she will someday have to explain.
Andy A
#londonandrews #londonandrewsmodel #beautiful #sexy #curvymodel #adultmodel #misrepresentation #insults #abuse #lies #blackmail #catfishing #londonandrewsproject #londonandrewsandme




















